Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Correct Again

I've said it and said it, and still people worry. Today, though, we heard it from the man himself.
It would be surprising if I selected a Treasury secretary who had had no connection with the last Democratic administration because that would mean the person had no experience in Washington whatsoever. And I suspect you would be troubled and the American people would be troubled if I selected a Treasury secretary or a chairman of the National Economic Council…who had no experience whatsoever.

--snip--

But understand where the vision for change comes from first and foremost. It comes from me. That’s my job — is to provide a vision in terms of where we are going and to make sure that my team is implementing it.

Since I'm now, officially, more right than Bill Kirstol has ever been in his entire pundit career, can I get a slot on the Times op-ed page?

2 comments:

Democracy Lover said...

Well, let's just say you agree with way the Obama team is positioning their cabinet selection process. Whether these are smart choices or dumb ones remains to be seen.

I will admit that your record of accuracy and the clarity of your thought far exceeds that of Bill Kristol. If only those were important in the media business.

Geoffrey Kruse-Safford said...

"I will admit that your record of accuracy and the clarity of your thought far exceeds that of Bill Kristol."

That's like saying I have more compassion than Pol Pot. In other words, an analogy like that isn't a ringing endorsement.

Virtual Tin Cup

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More