Sunday, August 05, 2007

Aspects of Evil

The great question that faces all explicit and implicit discussions about God is the reality of evil. Philosopher of religion William R. Jones, writing a critique of black theologies of liberation back in the 1970's, insisted that implicit in all protest theologies are answers to the question of the presence of evil. His own critique, title Is God a White Racist?, gave the answer that they are deficient because they make the traditional mistake of classical theology since Augustine, viz., giving short shrift to the presence of evil in human individual and social life, essentially claiming that evil is a non-existent, indeed is non-existence as a negating force.

Intellectual historian Jeffrey Burton Russell has written a four-volume history of the idea of the personification of evil, the second and fourth volumes of which I have read. He begins each volume with a preface in which he makes his own position clear with a newspaper account of of the potential for radical evil in the world - the account of a serial killer, or a pathological person who destroys the life of a child or children. I like that because it keeps one aware of the reality we all face. Evil is not just one among many intellectual problems facing human beings, to be solved through clever reasoning. It is, rather, the existential problem that refuses reduction and idealization. We are confronted by evil, not just in other individuals and in institutions, but in our own lives. We are most honest with ourselves when we view incidents of evil-doing as a very real, very dangerous possibility for ourselves. This is the first movement towards a healthy, honest humility in all things human.

It is important to make something clear at this point. I have been struggling to make clear in the past weeks my own intuition of what for lack of a better word can be called the Divine. I employ the language of the Christian Church and tradition because it is the tradition in which I was raised, and it is the vocabulary I find most adequate for understanding. At the same time, I must confess that behind the words stands an intuition, a very personal experience of the depth of life and experience that transcends my own ability to communicate. Explicit within that intuition is not just an intuition of the greatness and loving-kindness of God, but of the very real presence of evil. I refuse to personalize this presence by giving it the name Satan, or less personal but still allegedly metaphysically real Devil. Employing these traditional Christian ideas brings along too much baggage from popular thought - all that Exorcist nonsense of horned creatures, puking children looking like lepers, and the rest - to be constructive or helpful. I prefer to de-personalize the reality of evil, but that does not make it any less real. Evil is an active force in the world, at both the interpersonal and social level. One denies this only at the expense of being naive or blind, or both.

When I say that evil is a force, I am suggesting that it exists independently of any and all instances of evil we encounter. I am further suggesting that it has power, although it is always a power of negation. To this extent, I think the traditional formulation was correct; only when they raised this existential, intuitive understanding to a metaphysical principle did they make the error that ended up making evil non-existent and non-existence.

In my own life, I have experienced the power of radical evil in any number of ways and occasions. There have been times in my life when I felt overwhelmed by it. The worst part of these times in my life was the simple fact that much of what happened was the result of my own actions; I succumbed to the temptation to make choices based not upon what was right or even prudent, but what I knew to be wrong. I have known the reality of the demonic in my own life, and have had to live with the consequences. I am not confessing to murdering, or even stealing; I am simply confessing that actions I have taken in the past have been destructive of my own and the lives of others, and there seemed at times no way out from under the weight of guilt and responsibility. That is a further aspect of evil - it leads to inaction due to the acceptance of responsibility.

This is where the mystery of grace comes in. Standing before one's life, viewing the wreckage one has caused, when one realizes there is no way one can get from where one is to where one wants to be on one's own, there can be an opportunity to open oneself to the possibility of living without guilt, but with a sense of responsibility. Grace is not some metaphysical factum that enters our lives, but the mysterious presence of the Divine that presents the opportunity to accept oneself as one is - precisely because one is accepted as one is.

These general comments are only the beginning of some thinking about evil.

2 comments:

Democracy Lover said...

I think all of us have taken actions from time to time that have been destructive to ourselves or others, and the healthier among us feel guilty for having done so. Part of this is the natural conflict between our more primitive animal instincts and our more evolved understanding, sometimes we just don't think before we act, sometimes the immediate pleasure of saying or doing something overwhelms the inner warnings of negative ramifications.

Does this mean there is a demonic force? I don't think so. When we are able to overcome these tendencies and live in harmony with nature and our fellow men, is that a sign of some divine positive force? I don't think so. It seems to me that positing external forces acting upon us poses a great deal more logical and philosophical problems than it solves.

Among them is the danger that we shift responsibility away from ourselves: "The Devil made me do it" and "I would be nothing without the grace of God" are just different sides of the same deflection. It also seems that inaction would be more a result of deflecting responsibility than taking it.



Are we not better off to blame ourselves for our shortcomings and congratulate ourselves for our achievements?

Erudite Redneck said...

Boy, DL, that just cuts to the chase, doesn't it? God is the measure of all things, or man is the measure of all things?

Myself, I conceive of evil as selfishness run amok, and God, or goodness, or whatever, as the harmony you mention, which I believe only emerges when people reach outside of themselves, often against their own interests. That is, good is antiselfishness and, as such, is unnatural for humans bent on self-defense and survival or advancement, and requires an outside agent, which I call "God."

On a lighter but still important (to me) note: As a teen and young person, steeped in fundamentalist concepts of devils and imps and evvviillll (a demon behind every doily, some said!), I found a mechanism in "The Wizard of Oz" for overcoming fear of evil and the devil, or Satan, or whatever personification one wants to employ (because I have no more problem putting a face, so to speak, on evil, than I do naturally lapsing into thinking of God God's self in such personal terms):

The devil is the man behind the curtain, not the Great Big Scary Oz. In Christian theology, the devil is defeated. And so the devil can kiss my ass. That's one reason why, although I might fear for my life, "I shall fear no evil." The other, of course, is "Thou are with me."

Virtual Tin Cup

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More