I am an enthusiastic user of social media. I find Facebook and Twitter wonderful vehicles for getting and staying in touch with others, whether people from my past with whom I'd lost touch, or people I've come to know via electronic media, or just folks close by, getting an insight in to who they are apart from our regular encounters. All the same, I am aware of the medium's many faults and limitations, not the least of them the possibility that one gets a false impression of who all those "friends" are on the other side of the digital veil. Just as I assume the persona that others encounter when they read my tweets and status updates shows only a glimpse of a facet of who I am, I never believe I "know" those whose statuses I read. I assume I am getting a tiny hint, perhaps, of a deep passion for poetry, say; perhaps a secret love for painting or auto racing; even several years of Facebook statuses would fail to give me any interesting insight in to who the people I encounter there are.
At best, I might hope for the surprise that the rough-and-tumble, tattooed military vet has a soft spot for all those sickeningly sweet kitten pictures that float around the internet; perhaps I might find out that the young woman who seems so upright and devout also enjoys letting her hair down, rocking out with Stoly and dancing the night away at various watering holes. Not one to judge others, I find these insights more fascinating than anything as all of us do the grunt work of negotiating with others and determining for ourselves who we are.
I am also amused by the steady trickle of complaints about various policies Facebook implements. When they switched over their homepage format to "The Timeline", I sat and chuckled, reading all the people who posted what amounted to one long whine that Facebook might dare change without consulting them. Personally, I like the timeline format, finding it, if nothing else, an easy way of differentiating one's homepage from the usual news feed.
Then, there are the complaints that Facebook, as a corporation, might dare use information it gleans from our posts and clicks-through on ads both to target advertising to users as well as to create data that marketing firms and others might use in their research. How dare they! A corporation acting like . . . a corporation! I have to laugh out loud (for real, not LOL!) when people couch their protests at such indignities in the name of privacy.
If you have any expectation of privacy, or object to anyone using any image, word, sound, or other content put up on the internet without any express consent, my advice is simple enough: Get off it.
If you don't want people knowing you have a secret passion for porn, don't sign in to those websites using your Facebook account. If you're having an extra-marital affair, don't put pictures of you and your hoped-for future trophy wife frolicking in Cabo on Flickr. If you don't want your neighbors to know you drain a twelve-pack of beer every day, don't tweet, "Well, another platoon has fallen."
In other words, use some common sense. I have nothing against people who check out porn, or who carry on with those with whom they're not married, or anything else. If you do those things, then use the internet to communicate things about them, don't sit and bitch when this stuff suddenly becomes well known because it's your own fault.
Furthermore, while I agree to a point with Rob Horning's many articles and essays on the manipulative aspects of social media, I also believe he overdetermines it all just a bit. Were our identities so fragile that we were little more than the sum total of our status updates or photos or likes or tweets, we would be pitiable indeed. If true, how would it be possible to mourn such a state because there would be no access to a place outside from which to bewail such a diluted, inhuman reality. The fact is, social media are only as powerful and determinate as we allow them to be. Both individually and collectively, we need to exercise not only common sense and restraint, but a sense of proportion when it comes to how we use these marvelous tools for communicating. They are just tools, for all they give us access to other people and information about the world and a variety of ideas and thoughts and perspectives.
They are also borrowed tools. Facebook, Twitter, Linkedin, Google +, Flickr, and other social media are not ours; we use them under the terms set by those who do own and operate them. As such, the control over information we place on them disappears because the information ceases to be ours once it is up there.
Which brings me to a larger point. For all that the internet has created opportunities for people to collect and disseminate all sorts of information, the best part of the internet still seems to elude so many of its users. Once stuff is up here, it's up here forever. Anyone, anywhere, at any time in to the distant future has access to it. Whether it's a photomontage of your vacation to Paris or the love letters you've emailed to the next door neighbor, letting him know your husband has left for work and he can come over for some nooky, it's all there and no amount of pressing "delete" makes it go away. If someone wants to access it, they can and probably will. You don't want anyone to know about the fling with the dude next door? Don't use the internet to communicate about it! You don't want people to find out you're not quite as holy or unholy or bad or good or straight or gay as they might think you are? Then I suggest you don't post material on the internet that might lead them to discover this is the case.
A while back, I posted about my awe at how ignorant some people are about things on the internet. A gentleman from South Carolina had verbally attacked Sandra Fluke, then became enraged when those tweets were shared on various websites. He threatened legal action. He was one of far too many people who have not quite understood that the internet is a public forum. All those folks bitching about Facebook don't quite get it, either. Or, perhaps, their own sense of themselves is so fragile, they fear what others might think of them should some deep dark secret about them suddenly receive a blinding glare of light. Either way, I have only one wish.
Please, for crying out loud, remember where you are. Use some sense. Don't create a situation wherein you feel vulnerable because something you wanted kept private becomes public knowledge.
6 comments:
Nicely said Geoff. Maybe because I'm friends with people and volunteers that I work with on Facebook I'm always conscious of what I post and it's longevity.
And really? I've always been amazed at how often people complain about Facebook's policies. I really don't think social media is for everyone.
That's part of it, I think, Kelly. It isn't for everyone.
A year or two ago, someone I know wrote a post on his blog about how shocked he was that a young adult relative had used profanity on FB, and how he scolded her in public for behaving in such a manner. Imagine! A young adult using profanity!
I am very careful with FB because my older daughter and sixteen year old niece are friends with me; all the same, I do not chastise others if they use profanity in comments because (a) I'm an adult and (b) I'm no one to tell anyone else how to live their lives. If you think it necessary to suddenly become a school-marm, you might need to just step away for a bit.
Finally, do these people not see the irony in bitching about Facebook on Facebook?
"do these people not see the irony in bitching about Facebook on Facebook?"
Clearly, they do not. I wonder why they don't see the irony of bitching about something that is free to them. No one's forcing them to use it and they aren't paying for it.
Another marvelous point. With their shares falling, Facebook might well see some wisdom in charging a modest fee for using their services. Even if they lost twenty percent of their customers, that would still be an enormous influx of cash.
I was listening to a discussion on NPR and was amazed, again, at how little people understand that being connected to the internet means one is, quite literally, connected to every individual, government, terrorist group and network, criminal organization, intelligence organization, and all the rest, that exist in the world.
No amount of care can prevent a determined individual or group from getting in to your private information and either stealing it, or using your computer as a starting point for nefarious deeds. All the complaints about "privacy" when using what is a world-wide public forum demonstrate how little they understand what it is they're doing.
This trend is, I think, common when technology goes from a level requiring sophisticated knowledge to being an appliance.
When cars were new technology, you actually had to know how to work on a car in order to drive it. Now that they've become reliable, most people probably cannot even change their own oil, not to mention their brakes, spark plugs, or a fan belt.
When IT was new, you actually had to know something about how it worked in order to use it. I remember when email, Gopher and IRC were new, you actually had to know something about IP addresses and a little bit about how the network worked in order to use them. Now it's all just an appliance and most people couldn't begin to tell you anything useful about the internet beyond "it's a series of tubes."
So, ironically, the generation that uses these technologies the most tends to know the least about them. How is it that I, who only started using The Facebook last fall have to be the tech-support person for setting privacy settings for my niece and nephews?
An interesting theory, Alan.
I still love all the complaints about "privacy"". If you're on the 'net, it isn't private. Given enough know-how and time, even those who strut around being anonymous dicks can be found out, so even anonymity is no shield.
If you are seriously worried about privacy, you might want to stay off the internet. I think that was my main point.
Post a Comment