A good example, chosen at random (by me), is the following introduction to a special edition of the magazine in October, 2000, which can be found here:
Immune Cell Networks
Stephen Simpson, Stella M. Hurtley, and Jean Marx
To fight its ancient war on pathogens, the immune system has evolved a rich and diverse army of specialized cells (emphasis mine). They pull together through extraordinary means to prevent viruses, bacteria, and malignant cells from achieving their devastating ends. As a consequence, immunology has developed as a subject embracing the scrutiny not only of subcellular events but also of the intriguing and unexpected workings of a complex cellular system.
This special issue surveys recent developments in four areas of cellular immunology. In the first Review, Ravetch and Lanier (p. 84) discuss the abundant inhibitory receptors used by immune cells. By their sheer number, these receptors testify to the importance of diminishing the activity of lymphocytes once they have completed their task. Indeed, they provide a crucial safeguard against inappropriate immune responses and autoimmunity. In their Viewpoint, Fagarasan and Honjo (p. 89) focus on an unusual subclass of B cells, termed B1 cells, which reside in the peritoneal cavity and may provide a crucial link in the early phase of humoral immune responses. A striking feature of these cells is their ability to produce antibodies independently of T cell help. This property, along with distinct modes of migration and activation, could be key to the unusual niche that these lymphocytes occupy.
The dendritic cell (DC) is a strategic intermediary between pathogen and lymphocyte and as such continues to enjoy much attention from immunologists. In their Review, Lanzavecchia and Sallusto (p. 92) outline the remarkable dynamics of the relationship between the DC and the T cell and discuss the role that DCs play in guiding effector and memory T cell responses.
Pathogens are most frequently encountered at surfaces, such as the skin and the mucosal linings of the lung and gut. Because of the DCs they contain, these tissues also act as interfaces between the outside world of the pathogen and the cells of the systemic immune system. In a Viewpoint, Hayday and Viney (p. 97) develop this "information relay" paradigm. They suggest that many immune cells at mucosal surfaces play a dual role, offering local protection against pathogens while impeding overt reactivity to common harmless antigens.
A critical issue in all areas of cellular immunology is deciphering how the signals initiated by the cell-to-cell contacts that regulate immune responses are conveyed into a cell's interior. An excellent example of how this can be achieved is reported by Seddon et al. (p. 127), who examine the role of the signaling protein P56lck in the survival and expansion of T cells.
Finally, two News stories by Michael Hagmann focus on technical advances that are promoting our understanding of cellular and other aspects of immunology. The first (p. 80) describes how computer modeling is helping to identify the antigen fragments that stimulate strong immune response and might thus be suitable candidates for vaccine development. A second story (p. 82) focuses on the use of microarray technology to identify the gene changes involved in normal immune cell activities and in diseases, including blood cell cancers.
Although steady progress is being made in characterizing the key molecular players of the immune system, the extraordinary cellular network that these components make up remains mysterious, and there is much left to explore.
The following is an abstract of one of the featured articles in this special edition:
T-Independent Immune Response: New Aspects of B Cell Biology
Sidonia Fagarasan, Tasuku Honjo*
Recent results emphasize the roles of T-independent antibody response in humoral defenses, for which B1 cells and marginal zone B cells are mostly responsible. We discuss how these cells are activated, migrate, and differentiate into antibody-producing cells in various lymphoid tissues. Based on recent findings in each of these areas of B cell biology, we propose a possible mechanism for peripheral tolerance of autoreactive B cells at target organs.
Department of Medical Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
I am highlighting this because it seems to me that what scientists actually do, as opposed to what "creation scientists" or "intelligent design" advocates claim science does, is pretty mundane, highly specialized, and technically complicated. What the latter do is obfuscatory, unintelligible, and contradictory to the very nature of the scientific enterprise. I believe the technical, somewhat obscure, nature of technical scientific literature is part of the problem we have in this country; it is remote from the way the bulk of Americans tend to carry on their professional lives, and it seems unduly confusing. Just because it is so, however, does not excuse the on-going war on science by the anti-science crowd. Should we toss the bath water of evolution over the side, we will most definitely lose the baby of actual social benefit from real scientific research based upon the idea (highlighted by me in the above introductory passage) that evolution is a real process. "Creationists" and "intelligent design" advocates can offer us nothing in response, or as a counter to the very real benefits of doing real science.
